http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2196 |
So imagine you could use this neural dust, one mote per neuron, to "read out" a brain. How much data would this be?
Get out your envelope backs!
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.002.2010 |
How much is that?
It's about 1 optical fiber. The maximum conceivable bandwidth of a single-mode optical fiber is set by the frequency range where it's clear enough to transmit light without melting. That number is about 1 petabit (10^15)/s, depending on the transmission distance. (see this discussion on StackExchange). Bit rates of about 10% of that have been achieved in the laboratory using "Space Division Multiplexing" (see this news article or this keynote from a real expert), while the current generation of optical networking products use multiple channels of 100 Gigabit Ethernet to achieve as much as 10Tb/s on a fiber, about 1% of the theoretical limit. A petabit per second is a ways in the future, but so is our neuro-dust.) Even now, we could probably fit a brain dump on 16 of the laboratory fiber systems.
So we can imagine putting the bandwidth of a brain onto a cable we can hold in our hands.
But how much is THAT?
Cisco puts out a report every year estimating the total traffic on the internet. This year, they're estimating that the total IP traffic in the world is 62,476 petabytes per month. That's about 190 terabits/second. So a brain readout would be about 8 times the internet's total data rate.
Right now, powering that much dust would be impractical. Currently a neural dust mote uses a half a milliwatt of power, which means 10 megawatts to read the whole brain. So it gets fried, but it was just watching Netflix.
but ... you may not need to read the whole brain ... particularly if you do the transfer over an extended period of time ... and have some way to control the environment and get some sort of suitable feedback loop set up to explore the feature space that you are trying to capture... perhaps using the brain's own plasticity to enhance the data transmission between the implant and the brain? Or perhaps view it as a close integration rather than a transfer?
ReplyDeletePerhaps if you knew the connection pattern and strength of the 150 trillion synapses, then perhaps you could compute the evolution of the data flow between. So maybe a petabyte of state information.
DeleteI just thought it was interesting to think about how much information is flowing.